Next: ms Body Text, Previous: ms Document Control Registers, Up: ms [Contents][Index]
Use the following macros to create a cover page for your document in the order shown.
no
]Specifies the report format for your document. The report format
creates a separate cover page. The default action (no RP
macro)
is to print a subset of the cover page on page 1 of your document.
If you use the word no
as an optional argument, groff
prints a title page but does not repeat any of the title page
information (title, author, abstract, etc.) on page 1 of the
document.
(P-one) Prints the header on page 1. The default is to suppress the header.
(optional) Prints the current date, or the arguments to the macro if
any, on the title page (if specified) and in the footers. This is the
default for nroff
.
(optional) Prints the current date, or the arguments to the macro if
any, on the title page (if specified) but not in the footers. This is
the default for troff
.
Specifies the document title. groff
collects text following the
TL
macro into the title, until reaching the author name or
abstract.
Specifies the author’s name, which appears on the line (or lines) immediately following. You can specify multiple authors as follows:
.AU John Doe .AI University of West Bumblefuzz .AU Martha Buck .AI Monolithic Corporation ...
Specifies the author’s institution. You can specify multiple institutions in the same way that you specify multiple authors.
no
]Begins the abstract. The default is to print the word
ABSTRACT, centered and in italics, above the text of the
abstract. The word no
as an optional argument suppresses this
heading.
Ends the abstract.
The following is example mark-up for a title page.
.RP .TL The Inevitability of Code Bloat in Commercial and Free Software .AU J. Random Luser .AI University of West Bumblefuzz .AB This report examines the long-term growth of the code bases in two large, popular software packages; the free Emacs and the commercial Microsoft Word. While differences appear in the type or order of features added, due to the different methodologies used, the results are the same in the end. .PP The free software approach is shown to be superior in that while free software can become as bloated as commercial offerings, free software tends to have fewer serious bugs and the added features are in line with user demand. .AE ... the rest of the paper follows ... |
Next: ms Body Text, Previous: ms Document Control Registers, Up: ms [Contents][Index]